Google has not officially called generated content a stop factor for ranking. Algorithms are not against artificial intelligence, but only if it is used to create quality content. How does this work in practice? The editors of Contentim have prepared an overview of interesting experiments on this topic.
Generative neural networks are taking away copywriters' bread and butter. Enterprising israel phone number library webmasters have calculated that texts written by robots are dozens of times cheaper. And they take significantly less time. Only advantages.
The question remains how search engines treat such content - is it possible to reach the top of search results using AI texts?
Google has not officially called generated content a stop factor. Algorithms are not against artificial intelligence, but only if it is used to create quality content according to EEAT principles. Without spam and attempts to manipulate the search results.
How does this work in practice? Catch a review of interesting experiments on this topic. Who wins in the fight for the top results - authors or robots?
Content
The Verge Case
Let's start small. The Verge published a funny article about the best printer of 2023, which was written by ChatGPT. Short, only 300 words. Surprisingly, it got to the first page of search results, and this is for a highly competitive query. It beat out Cnet, TechRadar, New York Times, Forbes.
The Verge