The science of telemarketing sales

[badabunsebl11]

Of the unfortunate and vague formula " within the scope of " which recalls with . Sad freshness the pen of the legislator in the recent law no. With the new . Art. -bis of the privacy code, harbinger of questionable limitations also in conflict with the . Gdpr for the secondary use of data for scientific research or statistical purposes, making the . Qualified interpreter think of the same and not sufficiently expert technical-legislative writer; second, the lack . Of specialist expertise in the letter of the paragraph in question stands out, since it .


Is clear that, if the processing of common personal data were bulk sms philippines necessary to perform the . Contract to which the interested party is a party, no consent would consequently be required . Pursuant to art. .. A of the privacy code and art. ..B of the gdpr, while . The only consents could be configured for purposes other than the mere execution of the . Contract.It is true that the formula " within the scope of " seems to lend . Itself, due to its naivety, precisely, to the interpretation according to which the consent to .



Previous telephone marketing may remain valid even if the condition, additional to a previously given . Marketing consent, of the persistence of an existing contractual relationship or one that ceased less . Than thirty days ago occurs; therefore, without "Necessity" of processing for direct telephone marketing purposes, . Based on the interested party's consent, for the purposes of the mere execution of the . Contract. Another perplexing aspect to be reported, also evidently deriving from a basic technical roughness . In the drafting of the law, is the fact that it is not clear whether .