Why compare texts?
Posted: Wed Dec 11, 2024 7:16 am
Everyone knows that unique content ranks higher, so everyone double-checks the unique texts they post. But few people think that if a site contains many similar materials, the search engine will consider only the first page it visited as unique.
For example, you have a project about US casinos. All the texts in the section are written according to approximately the same plan on more or less one topic (types of casinos). And then you are sent two texts for posting - "The most disgusting US casinos" and "The coolest US casinos". You double-check the unique - each article has a unique number higher than 85% for the service you have chosen. In theory, everything is fine and you can post. And then you compare these two texts with each other and find out that the difference between them is less than 70% - this means that after posting both articles, only the first one will have a unique number higher than 85%, and the second one will be unique by only 10-30%, which is completely unsatisfactory.
We in the editorial office have also found other amazing things by italy phone number material comparing texts with each other, for example:
Copy-paste from one article to another. The unscrupulous author simply copied entire paragraphs from one text to another, while the unique verification service did not find anything, because each article was unique relative to the content on the Internet.
Superficial rewriting. The author did not try to conduct original research for each material, but simply rewrote each sentence of his first article into the second, changing individual words. For example, in the first it was "Scary US casinos inspire fear in players", and in the second "Cool US casinos inspire admiration in players". The unique verification service will not find this either. By the way, this gives away an amateur. Here we talk about other signs of a bad gambling copywriter.
It also happens that the author is not slacking off, but is simply tired or has become a hostage to his writing style and unconsciously repeats some ideas or constructions in several articles. This can be harmful to uniqueness in the same way as copied content.
Therefore, in all typical articles we always compare texts with each other, even if this is not in the client's TOR. And we recommend including comparison services in the TOR with the mandatory indication of the normal value of matches.
This value depends on the volume of text, the topic (terminology and stable professional slang) and the unchangeable content on the page, such as section headings. On average, a normal difference between two texts should be 60-70%, that is, only 30-40% of the content should match, including keywords, headings and other things that cannot be changed by the author.
Top 5 Services for Comparing Texts
Most of the services below are free and do not require registration. The interface is almost the same everywhere: you simply paste the first and second text into separate windows and click "Check". After that, the system gives the result in percentage (what percentage matches) and shows the matching fragments.
Backlinks Manager
Backlinks Manager
For example, you have a project about US casinos. All the texts in the section are written according to approximately the same plan on more or less one topic (types of casinos). And then you are sent two texts for posting - "The most disgusting US casinos" and "The coolest US casinos". You double-check the unique - each article has a unique number higher than 85% for the service you have chosen. In theory, everything is fine and you can post. And then you compare these two texts with each other and find out that the difference between them is less than 70% - this means that after posting both articles, only the first one will have a unique number higher than 85%, and the second one will be unique by only 10-30%, which is completely unsatisfactory.
We in the editorial office have also found other amazing things by italy phone number material comparing texts with each other, for example:
Copy-paste from one article to another. The unscrupulous author simply copied entire paragraphs from one text to another, while the unique verification service did not find anything, because each article was unique relative to the content on the Internet.
Superficial rewriting. The author did not try to conduct original research for each material, but simply rewrote each sentence of his first article into the second, changing individual words. For example, in the first it was "Scary US casinos inspire fear in players", and in the second "Cool US casinos inspire admiration in players". The unique verification service will not find this either. By the way, this gives away an amateur. Here we talk about other signs of a bad gambling copywriter.
It also happens that the author is not slacking off, but is simply tired or has become a hostage to his writing style and unconsciously repeats some ideas or constructions in several articles. This can be harmful to uniqueness in the same way as copied content.
Therefore, in all typical articles we always compare texts with each other, even if this is not in the client's TOR. And we recommend including comparison services in the TOR with the mandatory indication of the normal value of matches.
This value depends on the volume of text, the topic (terminology and stable professional slang) and the unchangeable content on the page, such as section headings. On average, a normal difference between two texts should be 60-70%, that is, only 30-40% of the content should match, including keywords, headings and other things that cannot be changed by the author.
Top 5 Services for Comparing Texts
Most of the services below are free and do not require registration. The interface is almost the same everywhere: you simply paste the first and second text into separate windows and click "Check". After that, the system gives the result in percentage (what percentage matches) and shows the matching fragments.
Backlinks Manager
Backlinks Manager